The selected text could be analyzed regarding other readings that discuss the freedom of will, the concept of justice, and peoples readiness to struggle for their beliefs. He might not be satisfied with them however, it does not mean that he can violate them to cultivate injustice and new problems. He is a part of this world, and he acts concerning the basic rules that regulate its existence.
In such a way, any person living in society is limited in his/her actions since the first days of his life (Plato 56). It states that individuals surrender some of their freedoms with the primary aim to establish a particular legal environment in which individuals will live governed by their rulers. The passage also introduces ideas of the social contract theory of government. For this reason, a person should act by his/her values and beliefs as the only way to cultivate a fair attitude and demonstrate his/her innocence. Injustice could not be an appropriate response to injustice as it will result in the appearance of numerous problems and undermine the basis of society. However, the famous philosopher refuses to do it as it contradicts his ideas of justice. It describes the dialogue between Socrates and his friend Crito who suggests he escape (Plato 56). Thus, this idea is fundamental to the whole text.
Moreover, an individual who alters perspectives on different issues is not worth being respected as he/she betrays the most significant values and beliefs that are part of human nature. If a person acts contrary to these beliefs, he/she loses his/her identity and becomes an outcast. It presents readers with the idea that a person consists of a set of concepts that determine his/her attitude to particular phenomena, including justice and injustice. In such a way, the given passage could be considered one of the most important parts of the whole text.
0 kommentar(er)
